Are You an Omni-Channel or Unified Commerce Retailer?

For some retailers, there is no differentiation between being an omni-channel brand vs being a unified commerce brand. The terms are used interchangeably, but are, indeed, fundamentally different. Omni-Channel is a strategy in which brands interact across multiple channels (eg in store, on line, mobile, social). Unified commerce, however, is about a holistic user experience that provides seamless engagement into one platform. True seamless integration requires technological enhancements that allow for a single view of the customer, regardless of where, when or how they shop.


In recent years, retailers have been enhancing their systems so that they can address the increasing demands of the customer.

A true unified commerce retailer needs a fully integrated system that not only connects but unifies the shopper’s journey and purchase path end-to-end. New connected systems can create visibility from source to self to shopper. Purchase history, loyalty behaviors, earned rewards, promotional activity, prior online chat, customer service calls, and in-person conversations are all captured and available on demand by the end user in real time.


While retailers have evolved their multi-channel and omni practices, many are still being held back by technological barriers. From sourcing and supply to planning and allocation through purchase and re-purchase, being a true unified brand requires modern systems. If you have not accessed your current people, process and technology—it’s time. The industry is becoming more complex; consumers are becoming more demanding and the competition is becoming more elevated. Layer on AI and brands who were successful less than 5 years ago may find themselves not only antiquated, but obsolete.

  • Shoppers now expect to be able to engage with brands online, mobile, in store, via call centers, through direct mail and on social commerce platforms.

  • These behaviors are rarely linear. Instead, customers will search for products or browse online, but then be triggered by a social posting and click to the brand’s website to make a purchase.

  • They may research the product online but want to pick the product/purchase up in store later that day or have it delivered within the hour.

  • In turn, they may have made a catalog or direct mail purchase and brought the item back to the store for a different size, color, or item. These types of transactions are far from easy, no matter how effortless they appear to the shopper.

  • Previously, retailers would create manual processes to accommodate cross channel services like BOPIS (Buy Online, Pick up In Store). Such practices may look seamless to the consumer, but require employees to engage with various systems to work across channels/platforms.

  • Returned items, as well, can create complexity if the product was purchased on one channel and brought back to another. Again, this may be effortless to the shopper, but the store needs to potentially work across sale and inventory systems to reconcile.

Katrina Mossman

Partner
Columbus Consulting

Go to article: CoverGo to article: Table of contentsGo to article: EditorialGo to article: AsendiaUSA AdGo to article: Engage3Go to article: CoveoGo to article: KyndrylGo to article: Annex CloudGo to article: IpsosGo to article: Mercatus AdGo to article: PerionGo to article: VibesGo to article: SAP EmarsysGo to article: CoveoGo to article: Annex CloudGo to article: Toshiba AdGo to article: Columbus ConsultingGo to article: Delivery SolutionsGo to article: MercatusGo to article: IpsosGo to article: CrispGo to article: parcelLabGo to article: Asendia USAGo to article: GreenablGo to article: Seagull SoftwareGo to article: C.H. RobinsonGo to article: Gemini Shippers AssociationGo to article: Asendia USAGo to article: Hivery AdGo to article: Table of contents